Beholder
Beholder
Drawing \ Uncategorized | 09/26/04 @723 |
Eilidh |
critiques (29) |
views (5023)
Do not copy, modify, distribute or sell the whole or parts of the image above without permission of the creator. More.
Description
Bholdr/gtsouk from #linux on irc.gr. =)------------------
February 2004
Photoshop 7
Vote statisticsRecent: 0 votes, 0 pointsTotal: 34 votes, 229 points |
Cast your voteYou have to be logged in to voteVoting? Read the faq |
OptionsNone |
Additional Downloads
progress images [974x233 px] [85k] |
Comments (29)
Comment
To write a comment you need to be logged in
If you're not a registered member, click here to sign up.Reviews (0) beta
Write a review
To write a review you need to be logged in
If you're not a registered member, click here to sign up.Search the site
Found a dead link? Report it!
Copyright © 2000-2009 All rights reserved
Read the Terms of use and Privacy Statement.
This site is a property of Brothers in art For more information and support, contact .
Copyright © 2000-2009 All rights reserved
This site is a property of Brothers in art For more information and support, contact .



09/26/04 @738
09/26/04 @791
Also, love that you did it in grays.
Where's the rest of your work? Post some of those marvelous portraits on your website.
09/26/04 @793
09/26/04 @910
09/27/04 @029
I have had an account here since 2002, and I was voted into the Elite in June 2003. In November of the same year or thereabours I removed all my artworks and left GFX, so it makes perfect sense if you don't remember me and think I appeared out of nowhere. =)
Just now I have started resubmitting work -- little by little: I don't want to swamp the site all of a sudden.
On a side note; I do not paint over photographs. Some of my paintings are done quickly, hence their roughness and often their inaccuracy, and to some I pay more attention, correcting things and refining as I work. To illustrate exactly what I mean, I've added the progress images of this portrait -- from the first, very rough and not quite right sketch, to the finished result. Please check it out and reconsider what you just said; I think it ought to be proof enough. (Also, since you referred to my site, I'd suggest you checked the traditional gallery as well. If I didn't have the skill to paint digitally except in paintovers, it would have been impossible to have drawn a couple of life drawings in it.)
This is something I will not do with all my works, though; it is pointless to constantly try to prove the obvious. Also, I do not work to achieve super-realism, nor create perfectly shiny pictures. I work mainly in order to learn, and to depict certain things I want, the way I want; which is not always a realistic, and definitely not a "pretty" way of painting.
09/27/04 @030
emarts, I will gradually post the rest of my works. I just didn't want to fill the elite gallery at once.
09/27/04 @284
Again someone compares digital painting to traditional media and puts it down because you can't "feel" it. You can't feel photographs either and it is recognized as a true artform. Don't judge digital art by what it's not (oil painting), judge it by what it is and by what it can become.
09/27/04 @289
I love how you did the face, and that shadow makes the character really strong. I just think the background doesn't fit. But here! 8+
09/27/04 @455
I agree; with the ridiculousness of such a request and your assesment of "digital art" compared to traditional. It's just another tool for an artist, and I come from a traditonal arts background, and will continue to paint and love oils, but feel that it shouldn't impede my foray or attitude into the digital painting realm.
I feel the "prove it" mentality will only escalate since the new guidelines for submitting art was laid out. I think the new guidelines are good, but this is the natural result.
BTW: Digital art can be printed out in various formats, and at that point is no more "digital" or "mechanical" or less "touchable" than any other art print or giclee' purchased by art collectors.
And you are correct, an original photo print/output wouldn't be any different than a digital art output. But just as it has taken the stodgey "art world" to acknowledge photography as art, illustration as art, acrylic paintings as art, it'll take awhile for them to get used to the digital aspect of things.
09/27/04 @482
I do not believe that who has the maestria to make pretty paintings, I go to make so ugly others exactly when of form he would not be![/i]
how old are you?? sounds like a 10 year old rambling.
the path to abstraction is a common field of exploration for many graphic artists but i guess it takes some experience and maturity to understand it.
09/28/04 @965
It swims against you only for the truth!
Kisses for your !
09/28/04 @968
09/28/04 @133
09/28/04 @136
09/28/04 @296
Eilidh, sorry for turning your art into a forum for debate.
09/28/04 @329
09/28/04 @630
It's pointless, GFXartist is a great community and we have to believe in each other, one wouldn't become an elite member if there wasn't a good reason for it.
(+7/7)
09/28/04 @836
09/29/04 @202
-Henning
10/01/04 @737
Wonderful work Eilidh
10/02/04 @705
keep up the good work and for me this looks very much like sculpting. beautiful shading.
10/03/04 @030
10/08/04 @624
10/13/04 @008
10/17/04 @616
Eilidh,don't care for that rude comments.They just love talking and talking and talking..
Phryneas,good point about pic.
10/18/04 @967
10/31/04 @992
10/20/08 @581
05/09/09 @486
You did a great choice by working as b&w. I can only critique about his neck. ıt looked a bit smooth to me. but thats all. Still a great piece.